Date: April 11, 1973

Time: 3:18 pm – 4:49 pm

Location: Oval Office

The President met with John D. Ehrlichman, H. R. (“Bob”) Haldeman, and Ronald L. Ziegler.

Simplified tax return

-George P. Schultz

-45-

NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

Tape Subject Log

(rev. February-2011)

-Evaluation

President’s schedule

-Evening meetings

Watergate

-Problems of presidency

-Excessive strength

-Lack of candor

-Role of Senate

-Scheduling

-Televised hearings

-Witnesses

-White House staff

-John N. Mitchell, Robert C. Mardian, Frederick LaRue, Jeb Stuart

Magruder

-Haldeman

-John W. Dean, III

-Possible presidential actions

-Popular perceptions

-Value of initiative

-Role of Ervin Committee

-Grand jury

-Dean

-Instructions concerning privilege

-Ehrlichman, Leonard Garment

-Protection of Mitchell

-Magruder

-Sally H. Harmony’s testimony

-G[eorge] Gordon Liddy

-Gordon C. Strachan’s testimony

-Haldeman’s hiring of Donald H. Segretti

-$350,000

-Handling

-Haldeman’s instructions

-LaRue

-Haldeman’s hiring of Donald H. Segretti

-Possible press reports

-Gray’s testimony about Segretti

-46-

NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

Tape Subject Log

(rev. February-2011)

-Dwight L. Chapin, Herbert W. Kalmbach

-Dean

-Effects of possible testimony on Mitchell

-Haldeman’s possible testimony

-Watergate investigation

-Warren Commission

-Special prosecutor

-Ervin Committee

-Exercise of privilege

-Ervin Committee’s functions

-Protection of White House

-Haldeman

-Relationship with Magruder

-Long-term effects of testimony

-Future statements

-Washington Post

-Carl Berstein

-Robert U. (“Bob”) Woodward

-Ervin Committee

-Testimony by White House staff

-Conditions: voluntary vs. court-ordered

-Supreme Court ruling

-Effects of televised hearings

-John D. Ehrlichman’s negotiations with Samuel J. Ervin, Jr.

-Dean’s appearance before Grand Jury

-Ehrlichman letter on Dean

-Testimony by White House staff

-Haldeman

-Dean

-Committee staff’s view of Haldeman or Mitchell’s role

-Haldeman

-Allegations against

-Executive privilege

-John B. Connally’s view

-President’s position

-Candor

-White Hosue staff testimony before Ervin Committee

-Investigation for President

-Ehrlichman’s suggestion of appointing a justice to write report

-47-

NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

Tape Subject Log

(rev. February-2011)

-Ervin Committee Report

-Leaks

-Grand Juries

-Strachan’s testimony

-Harmony’s testimony

-Public impressions

-Press coverage

-Ervin Committee

-White House staff testimony

-Dean

-Executive privilege

-White House cooperation

-Dean

-Possible testimony before Grand Jury

-Grand Jury leaks

-Washington, DC

-Funds

-Ervin Committee

-Executive Branch investigation

-Possible testimony against Dean

-Ehrlichman’s hypothetical testimony example

-Statement by Dean

-Effect

-Ziegler’s example of hypothetical testimony from a woman

-Linda Lovelace

-Possible testimony by Magruder

-Possible statements by Dean

-Attendance at Committee for the Re-election of the President [CRP]

meetings

-Requests from Mitchell for money

-Kalmbach

-Role in raising money

-Popular impression

-Possible lack of testimony

-Mitchell

-New York Daily News story

-New York Grand Jury

-Ervin Committee

-Televised hearings

-48-

NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

Tape Subject Log

(rev. February-2011)

-Successful witnesses

-Howard Hughes

-Francis A. (“Frank”) Sinatra

-Problems

-Dean’s availability

-White House position

-Possible future testimony on Dean

-Scope of possible testimony

-Grand Jury

-Public reaction

-Forthcoming Grand Jury testimony

-Staff’s discussions with Grament

-Dean

-Haldeman

-Charles Colson, Chapin, Strachan

-Availability of witnesses

-Hierarchy

-Executive privilege

-Haldeman

-Executive privilege

-Knowledge

-Comparison with Dean’s situation

-Layers of Executive privilege

-Dean

-Forthcoming testimony

-Knowledge

-Federal Bureau of Investigation [FBI] raw files

-Contact with Donald H. Segretti

-Written interrogatories

Stephen B. Bull entered at an unknown time after 3:18 pm.

President’s schedule

-Trip to Camp David

-Departure time

-Transportation

-Marine One helicopter

Bull left at an unknown time before 4:20 pm.

-49-

NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

Tape Subject Log

(rev. February-2011)

Watergate

-Ervin Committee

-Haldeman

-Dean

-Arrangements for forthcoming testimony

-Televised hearings

-Forthcoming White House statements

-Dean report

-Mitchell

-Risks

-Timing

-Future attacks by committee

-Timing

-Wording

-Possible statement by Haldeman

-Response to allegations

-New York Post story’s contents

-Lowell P. Weicker, Jr.

-Involvement with Segretti

-Document by Ehrlichman for negotiations

-Televised hearings

-Changes

Ziegler left at 4:20 pm.

Watergate

-Ervin Committee

-Ehrlichman’s negotiations

-Televised hearings

-Impact on possibility of White House staff testimony

-Approval by committee

-Information given to Garment

-Discrepancies

-Ratification by committee compared to gentleman’s agreement

-FBI raw files

-Televised hearing

-Objections by witnesses

-Ehrlichman’s negotiations

-50-

NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

Tape Subject Log

(rev. February-2011)

-Committee process

-Circus atmosphere

-Dean’s testimony

-Dean

-Forthcoming appearance before Grand Jury

-Possible treatment by committee members

-Weicker

-Joseph M. Montoya

-Erhlichman’s forthcoming negotiations with Ervin, April 11, 1973

-Timing of deal

-Televised hearings

-Testimony of White House staff

-Conditions

-Press reaction

-Televised hearings

-Other media

-Press attendance

-Motion pictures

-Radio

-Comparison with courtroom rules

-Televised hearings

-Duration of meeting

Ehrlichman left at 4:32 pm.

Watergate

-Ervin Committee

-Ziegler’s opinions

-Statements by White House staff

-Haldeman

-Possible statement

-Strachan

-Testimony

-Hugh W. Sloan, Jr.’s testimony concerning $350,000

-Haldeman’s connection with Segretti

-Watergate break-in

-Discussions with James Keough and Haldeman prior to testimony

-Haldeman’s instructions about testimony

-Mitchell

-51-

NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

Tape Subject Log

(rev. February-2011)

-Dean

-Discussions about funds

-Haldeman

-Ehrlichman

-Haldeman’s response to Dean’s request

-$350,000

-Haldeman’s instructions concerning disposition

-Origin

-Kalmbach’s role in 1970 election

-Haldeman’s suggestions

[Background noise from aircraft obscures conversation.]

Watergate

-$350,000

-Expenditure

-Concerns about campaign spending violations

-Responsibility

-Haldeman’s forthcoming statement

-Use

-Haldeman’s involvement in postelection use

-Strachan’s testimony

-Sloan’s testimony

-Watergate break-in

-Strachan’s testimony

-Original size of fund

-Maurice H. Stans

-Comparison with Democrats’ funds

-Dean

-Involvement with funds for burglars

-Use for funds

-Contact with burglars

Haldeman’s schedule

Haldeman left at 4:49 pm.

-52-

NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM

Tape Subject Log

(rev. February-2011)